This analysis by Matt Blaszczyk, Geoffrey McGovern, and Karlyn D. Stanley explores how U.S. copyright law grapples with AI-generated content, addressing whether AI-assisted works qualify for protection and how training datasets are treated under both U.S. and EU doctrines. It highlights a key insight: U.S. law requires human “authorial contribution” for copyrightability, while the EU allows rights holders to challenge commercial AI training—underscoring a growing legal divide. Timely hearings in Congress and updates from the U.S. Copyright Office make this discussion urgent for legal professionals managing copyright risks in generative AI projects. The analysis empowers practitioners with a clear roadmap for navigating emerging policy debates, licensing strategies, and litigation landscapes around AI-authored content—making it essential reading for IP counsel advising on innovation-driven initiatives.