This Harvard Law Review chapter tackles the “amoral drift” in AI corporate governance, warning that traditional tools—like board oversight and shareholder limits—fail to prevent companies like OpenAI and Anthropic from slipping toward profit-driven motives. It introduces the concept of “superstakeholders”—key talent and Big Tech backers whose equity-based influence can undermine an organization’s prosocial mission. The article also examines co-governance parallels, advocating democratic oversight structures that could anchor AI firms to ethical and societal objectives. Legal professionals and corporate counsel will want to dive into this piece to understand innovative governance mechanisms that balance existential AI risks with accountability.